Skip to content

Conversation

@dbussink
Copy link
Member

This extracts the logic from #18010 for replication setup. There are cases during upgrades and downgrades where the following can happen:

  • The replication user is created on a newer version with caching2_sha_password.
  • We downgrade from this newer version to an older version.
  • The older version doesn't have the logic to add the GET_SOURCE_PUBLIC_KEY flag so it fails to re-enable replication.

What this tells us, is that we need to first ship the change here to allow for future forward compatibility in v22, so we can change the default safely in v23.

It's safe to also send down this flag even with using mysql_native_password.

Related Issue(s)

Part of #17966

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Mar 25, 2025

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Mar 25, 2025
@dbussink dbussink removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Mar 25, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v22.0.0 milestone Mar 25, 2025
This extracts the logic from vitessio#18010 for replication setup. There are
cases during upgrades and downgrades where the following can happen:

- The replication user is created on a newer version with
  caching2_sha_password.
- We downgrade from this newer version to an older version.
- The older version doesn't have the logic to add the
  GET_SOURCE_PUBLIC_KEY flag so it fails to re-enable replication.

What this tells us, is that we need to first ship the change here to
allow for future forward compatibility in v22, so we can change the
default safely in v23.

Signed-off-by: Dirkjan Bussink <[email protected]>
@dbussink dbussink force-pushed the dbussink/caching-sha2-forward-compat branch from b05e797 to b64b778 Compare March 25, 2025 10:25
if params.SslEnabled() {
args = append(args, "SOURCE_SSL = 1")
} else {
args = append(args, "GET_SOURCE_PUBLIC_KEY = 1")
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.4/en/change-replication-source-to.html#crs-opt-get_source_public_key for what this flag does. It's only needed when SSL is not used for replication.

Copy link
Contributor

@GuptaManan100 GuptaManan100 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dbussink dbussink merged commit 8f48378 into vitessio:main Mar 25, 2025
101 checks passed
@dbussink dbussink deleted the dbussink/caching-sha2-forward-compat branch March 25, 2025 11:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants