Skip to content

Conversation

@csarven
Copy link
Member

@csarven csarven commented Sep 26, 2025

The current document generally covers aspects of potential discrimination, but not as explicitly tied to specific fields in (valid) credentials.

This PR is a proposal to resolve #20


Preview | Diff

Copy link
Contributor

@tantek tantek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like a good concern to list explicitly. Added an optional parenthetical since it was absence of a field in the Uruguay example that caused the problem

@csarven
Copy link
Member Author

csarven commented Oct 3, 2025

Updated to clarify potential discrimination due to presence or absence of optional fields. I believe this is aligned with the TAG Breakout C minutes (to be published) as well as Tantek's suggestion. Just thought this flows well.

Copy link
Contributor

@tantek tantek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @csarven this is a better way of phrasing it. Will leave it up your discretion whether or not you think my contribution was significant enough to merit listing as "co-authored".

@csarven csarven force-pushed the exclusion-discrimination branch from 4ca6a93 to 20d02a1 Compare October 8, 2025 08:39
@csarven
Copy link
Member Author

csarven commented Oct 8, 2025

Thanks for the reminder Tantek. Updated (using same details as your contributions to w3c/AB-public)

Copy link
Contributor

@tantek tantek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@csarven
Copy link
Member Author

csarven commented Oct 16, 2025

@martinthomson , in breakout C, the group decided to wait for you on this re merging (it is ready to go).

Copy link
Contributor

@martinthomson martinthomson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't realize that I hadn't shared this suggestion. Let's discuss.

@martinthomson martinthomson merged commit a103384 into w3ctag:main Oct 23, 2025
1 check passed
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2025
SHA: a103384
Reason: push, by martinthomson

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

When standards-compliant credentials are still rejected

4 participants