-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Add discrimination based on certain fields under Exclusion #52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like a good concern to list explicitly. Added an optional parenthetical since it was absence of a field in the Uruguay example that caused the problem
tantek
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @csarven this is a better way of phrasing it. Will leave it up your discretion whether or not you think my contribution was significant enough to merit listing as "co-authored".
Co-authored-by: Tantek Çelik <[email protected]>
4ca6a93 to
20d02a1
Compare
|
Thanks for the reminder Tantek. Updated (using same details as your contributions to w3c/AB-public) |
tantek
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
|
@martinthomson , in breakout C, the group decided to wait for you on this re merging (it is ready to go). |
martinthomson
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't realize that I hadn't shared this suggestion. Let's discuss.
Co-authored-by: Martin Thomson <[email protected]>
SHA: a103384 Reason: push, by martinthomson Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
The current document generally covers aspects of potential discrimination, but not as explicitly tied to specific fields in (valid) credentials.
This PR is a proposal to resolve #20
Preview | Diff