Skip to content

Conversation

@timvaillancourt
Copy link
Contributor

@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt commented Oct 9, 2025

Description

This PR makes the VTOrc problem PrimarySemiSyncMustBeSet require a minimum number of replicas have semi-sync enabled and are actively replicating, in order to avoid stalls in writes if the PRIMARY enables semi-sync without ackers

Also, @mattlord is added to the VTOrc CODEOWNERS 🎉 🙇

Related Issue(s)

Resolves #18712

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

AI Disclosure

@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt added Type: Bug Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature) Component: VTorc Vitess Orchestrator integration labels Oct 9, 2025
@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Oct 9, 2025

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Oct 9, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v24.0.0 milestone Oct 9, 2025
AND replica_instance.semi_sync_replica_enabled != 0
),
0
) AS count_valid_semi_sync_replicas_replicating,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We already have this data if we observe 2 x existing values from the GetDetectionAnalysis query, but we can't be certain both counts refer to the exact same instances, so this new value is added

@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt added Backport to: release-21.0 Backport to: release-22.0 Needs to be backport to release-22.0 Backport to: release-23.0 Needs to be backport to release-23.0 and removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Oct 9, 2025
@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt marked this pull request as ready for review October 9, 2025 15:26
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 9, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 88.23529% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 67.50%. Comparing base (3d7f63e) to head (bf6579f).
⚠️ Report is 49 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
go/vt/vtorc/inst/analysis.go 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #18732      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.50%   67.50%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1605     1605              
  Lines      263756   263820      +64     
==========================================
+ Hits       178046   178087      +41     
- Misses      85710    85733      +23     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt marked this pull request as draft October 9, 2025 18:03
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
@systay systay mentioned this pull request Oct 15, 2025
52 tasks
This was referenced Oct 27, 2025
@mattlord mattlord mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2025
28 tasks
@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt removed Backport to: release-21.0 Backport to: release-22.0 Needs to be backport to release-22.0 Backport to: release-23.0 Needs to be backport to release-23.0 labels Nov 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Component: VTorc Vitess Orchestrator integration Type: Bug Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug Report: vtorc can cause primary lock up when keyspace durability policy is changed

1 participant