Skip to content

Conversation

@tapastro
Copy link
Contributor

This PR addresses a failure in regression testing after our 1.16.0 release, coupled with the migration of pastasoss reference files to CRDS OPS. This test was introduced to ensure the prior algorithm could navigate an internal failure of the transform solver - that solver algorithm is now gone, and the new algorithm is robust to the previous issue (i.e. it does not care what pixel values exist). It is no longer relevant and can be removed.

Tasks

  • request a review from someone specific, to avoid making the maintainers review every PR
  • add a build milestone, i.e. Build 11.3 (use the latest build if not sure)
  • Does this PR change user-facing code / API? (if not, label with no-changelog-entry-needed)
    • write news fragment(s) in changes/: echo "changed something" > changes/<PR#>.<changetype>.rst (see below for change types)
    • update or add relevant tests
    • update relevant docstrings and / or docs/ page
    • start a regression test and include a link to the running job (click here for instructions)
      • Do truth files need to be updated ("okified")?
        • after the reviewer has approved these changes, run okify_regtests to update the truth files
  • if a JIRA ticket exists, make sure it is resolved properly
news fragment change types...
- ``changes/<PR#>.general.rst``: infrastructure or miscellaneous change
- ``changes/<PR#>.docs.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.stpipe.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.datamodels.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.scripts.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.fits_generator.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.set_telescope_pointing.rst``

## stage 1
- ``changes/<PR#>.group_scale.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.dq_init.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.emicorr.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.saturation.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.ipc.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.firstframe.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.lastframe.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.reset.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.superbias.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.refpix.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.linearity.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.rscd.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.persistence.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.dark_current.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.charge_migration.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.jump.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.ramp_fitting.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.gain_scale.rst``

## stage 2
- ``changes/<PR#>.assign_wcs.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.msaflagopen.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.nsclean.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.imprint.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.background.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.extract_2d.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.master_background.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.wavecorr.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.srctype.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.straylight.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.wfss_contam.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.flatfield.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.fringe.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.pathloss.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.barshadow.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.photom.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.pixel_replace.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.resample_spec.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.residual_fringe.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.cube_build.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.extract_1d.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.resample.rst``

## stage 3
- ``changes/<PR#>.assign_mtwcs.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.mrs_imatch.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.tweakreg.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.skymatch.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.exp_to_source.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.outlier_detection.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.tso_photometry.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.stack_refs.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.align_refs.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.klip.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.spectral_leak.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.source_catalog.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.combine_1d.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.ami.rst``

## other
- ``changes/<PR#>.wfs_combine.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.white_light.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.cube_skymatch.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.engdb_tools.rst``
- ``changes/<PR#>.guider_cds.rst``

Copy link
Collaborator

@emolter emolter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, yeah, this test should be specific to the old solver

Copy link
Collaborator

@melanieclarke melanieclarke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM too!

@tapastro
Copy link
Contributor Author

First test run exposed an issue with the rmap delivered in jwst_1289.pmap, but the one in the latest context works as expected: https://plwishmaster.stsci.edu:8081/job/RT/job/JWST-Developers-Pull-Requests/1746/

One failure, expected - the test was using the removed parameter soss_transform and therefore hadn't generated an output to okify until now. Merging!

@tapastro tapastro merged commit 8091a35 into spacetelescope:main Sep 24, 2024
@tapastro tapastro deleted the update-soss-regtests branch September 24, 2024 18:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants