-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 180
Remove attempted handling of memmap in container #9593
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9593 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 0.00% 79.48% +79.48%
==========================================
Files 368 368
Lines 37228 37228
==========================================
+ Hits 0 29589 +29589
+ Misses 37228 7639 -29589 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
| """ | ||
|
|
||
| def __init__(self, init=None, asn_exptypes=None, asn_n_members=None, **kwargs): | ||
| def __init__(self, init=None, asn_exptypes=None, asn_n_members=None, **kwargs): # noqa: ARG002 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is needed to allow keywords to be passed in but ignored, which is the current behavior. see #9590 where this will be fixed
melanieclarke
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
@meeseeksdev backport to release/1.19.x |
… of memmap in container) (#9633) Co-authored-by: Ned Molter <[email protected]>
This PR removes the
memmapoption fromModelContainer. No changelog is needed becausememmapwas not documented as an available parameter anywhere, including in theModelContainerdocstring.See also #9590 which will allow
ModelContainerto pass keyword arguments through todatamodels.open()on individual models, which is related but either PR could go in first (rebasing the second one).This PR must be merged before it is safe to merge spacetelescope/stdatamodels#507
Tasks
Build 12.0(use the latest build if not sure)no-changelog-entry-needed)changes/:echo "changed something" > changes/<PR#>.<changetype>.rst(see changelog readme for instructions)docs/pageokify_regteststo update the truth files