Replies: 2 comments
-
|
This is a decent idea, it removes the need for most of the "configure" functions. This is basically a compile-time parameter. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Another approach to this sort of configuration was previously discussed here: nasa/fpp#600 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
FPP currently supports a general set of F Prime properties (queue depth, priority, etc) for configuring components. How about a notion of component-unique properties? They could be set in the topology to customize behavior in a more explicit and model-searchable ways. For instance:
The topology FPP could have:
The
propertyfields could be any legal F Prime type.The generated code could have:
where:
The generated code could call the
setProperty_timeout(F32 val)function during init.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions