feat(features): add profiling-view flag

[aldy505]

Closes getsentry/sentry#95752

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.45%. Comparing base (524b8d4) to head (986b0c4).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3837   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.45%   99.45%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines         183      183           
=======================================
  Hits          182      182           
  Misses          1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[aldy505]

        for feature in (
            "organizations:discover",
            "organizations:global-views",
            "organizations:incidents",
            "organizations:integrations-issue-basic",
            "organizations:integrations-issue-sync",
            "organizations:invite-members",
            "organizations:sso-basic",
            "organizations:sso-saml2",
            "organizations:performance-view",
            "organizations:advanced-search",
            "organizations:session-replay",
            "organizations:issue-platform",
            "organizations:profiling",
            "organizations:profiling-view",
            "organizations:monitors",
            "organizations:dashboards-mep",
            "organizations:mep-rollout-flag",
            "organizations:dashboards-rh-widget",
            "organizations:transaction-metrics-extraction",
            "organizations:visibility-explore-view",
            "organizations:dynamic-sampling",
            "projects:custom-inbound-filters",
            "projects:data-forwarding",
            "projects:discard-groups",
            "projects:plugins",
            "projects:rate-limits",
            "projects:servicehooks",
        )

I feel like it's better if we tidy up these feature flags. Rather than moving on with #3802, why not just categorize the flags into something like:

        # Core features
        for feature in (
            "organizations:discover",
            "organizations:global-views",
            "organizations:incidents",
            "organizations:integrations-issue-basic",
            "organizations:integrations-issue-sync",
            "organizations:invite-members",
            "organizations:sso-basic",
            "organizations:sso-saml2",
            "organizations:advanced-search",
            "organizations:issue-platform",
            "organizations:dashboards-mep",
            "organizations:mep-rollout-flag",
            "organizations:dashboards-rh-widget",
            "organizations:dynamic-sampling",
            "projects:custom-inbound-filters",
            "projects:data-forwarding",
            "projects:discard-groups",
            "projects:plugins",
            "projects:rate-limits",
            "projects:servicehooks",
        ) 
        # Span/transactions feature
        + (
            "organizations:performance-view",
            "organizations:visibility-explore-view",
            "organizations:transaction-metrics-extraction",
        )
        # Profiling feature
        + (
            "organizations:profiling",
            "organizations:profiling-view",
        )
        # Cron monitoring feature
        + (
            "organizations:monitors",
        )
        # Session Replays feature
        + (
            "organizations:session-replay",
        )

[hubertdeng123]

@aldy505 I do like sectioning out the features into groups