Skip to content

Conversation

@manish-agrawal-ai
Copy link
Contributor

@manish-agrawal-ai manish-agrawal-ai commented Jan 20, 2023

Description

sending appName in the response of getAppWorkflow API

Fixes #2878

How Has This Been Tested?

  • by hitting the API (GET /v1beta1/application/workflow)

Checklist:

  • The title of the PR states what changed and the related issues number (used for the release note).
  • Does this PR requires documentation updates?
  • I've updated documentation as required by this PR.
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have tested it for all user roles.
  • I have added all the required unit/api test cases.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@manish-agrawal-ai manish-agrawal-ai merged commit 5377de3 into main Jan 20, 2023
@manish-agrawal-ai manish-agrawal-ai deleted the feat_appName_in_workflow_api branch January 20, 2023 10:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feature: AppName needed in the response of GetAppWorkflow API

3 participants