chore: allow devs to run locally a subset of e2e tests

[ppapapetrou76]

Checklist:

• Either (a) I've created an enhancement proposal and discussed it with the community, (b) this is a bug fix, or (c) this does not need to be in the release notes.
• The title of the PR states what changed and the related issues number (used for the release note).
• The title of the PR conforms to the Title of the PR
• I've included "Closes [ISSUE #]" or "Fixes [ISSUE #]" in the description to automatically close the associated issue.
• I've updated both the CLI and UI to expose my feature, or I plan to submit a second PR with them.
• Does this PR require documentation updates?
• I've updated documentation as required by this PR.
• I have signed off all my commits as required by DCO
• I have written unit and/or e2e tests for my change. PRs without these are unlikely to be merged.
• My build is green (troubleshooting builds).
• My new feature complies with the feature status guidelines.
• I have added a brief description of why this PR is necessary and/or what this PR solves.
• Optional. My organization is added to USERS.md.
• Optional. For bug fixes, I've indicated what older releases this fix should be cherry-picked into (this may or may not happen depending on risk/complexity).

As explained in the docs some times is very useful to run only a subset of tests, especially when adding new ones or changing code in given code area.

this small change allows devs to easily run a subset of the e2e tests

[bunnyshell]

❗ Preview Environment deployment failed on Bunnyshell

See: Environment Details | Pipeline Logs

Available commands (reply to this comment):

• 🚀 /bns:deploy to redeploy the environment
• ❌ /bns:delete to remove the environment

[reggie-k]

Very helpful! Maybe we can also add that after running make start-e2e-local any separate integration test can be run using the IDE's built-in "run test".

[blakepettersson]

I was going to say the exact same thing as you @reggie-k but you beat me to it 😄

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.47%. Comparing base (7cdc0f9) to head (da24f44).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #25514      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   62.45%   62.47%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         351      351              
  Lines       49490    49490              
==========================================
+ Hits        30910    30917       +7     
+ Misses      15621    15616       -5     
+ Partials     2959     2957       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[olivergondza]

Thanks a lot for doing this! I have suggested some improvements...

[ppapapetrou76]

@olivergondza @reggie-k @blakepettersson I think I addressed all your excellent comments!!
Can you please have another look?

[olivergondza]

Looks good to me. (I have not tested all variants of test/e2e with -local)