Skip to content

Conversation

@CosmosNi
Copy link
Contributor

EasySearch support schema_save_mode/data_save_mode

Purpose of this pull request

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

How was this patch tested?

Check list

}
```

SAVE_MODE (Add saveMode function)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
SAVE_MODE (Add saveMode function)
SAVE_MODE

}
```

配置表生成策略 (schema_save_mode)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
配置表生成策略 (schema_save_mode)
配置表生成策略

Comment on lines 108 to 110
// If any exception occurs, we return empty to indicate that save mode is not supported
// This allows the connector to continue working without save mode functionality
return Optional.empty();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's we should throw exception directly. Because the job not execute as expect.

Comment on lines 164 to 167
@DisabledOnContainer(
value = {},
type = {EngineType.SPARK, EngineType.FLINK},
disabledReason = "Test only one engine for first change")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's drop index before execute job. Then we can execute it more than once.

@corgy-w corgy-w merged commit 3ceb57f into apache:dev May 17, 2025
3 checks passed
dybyte pushed a commit to dybyte/seatunnel that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants