Skip to content

Conversation

@danyaljj
Copy link
Member

@danyaljj danyaljj commented Oct 8, 2016

http://mulan.sourceforge.net/download.html
https://github.com/tsoumakas/mulan

adding the basic definition of the function
issues:

  • the based classifier is not serializable

@kordjamshidi
Copy link
Member

kordjamshidi commented Oct 8, 2016

@danyaljj why is Mulan important to add? Basically Saul should allow us to make sophisticated structured output models so adding specific packages like Mulan seems inconsistent with the goal of Saul, to me.

@danyaljj
Copy link
Member Author

danyaljj commented Oct 8, 2016

I needed a ranking algorithm ....

@kordjamshidi
Copy link
Member

kordjamshidi commented Oct 8, 2016

So why as a part of Saul, you can use Saul as a dependency and write another project.

@kordjamshidi
Copy link
Member

BTW, it would be great to have a CCM formalization of ranking and see how we can do it in Saul, in a way that is consistent with our general formalization of structured output prediction using a specific loss, some constraints and classifiers.

@danr-ccg
Copy link
Contributor

danr-ccg commented Oct 8, 2016

Hi,

Please note that Kai-Wei implemented ranking with Illinois SL, and it would probably be easier to port/implement in Saul. The formulation is quite simple, and I’ll be happy to discuss if you want to incorporate in Saul.

          Dan

From: Parisa Kordjamshidi [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 7, 2016 10:50 PM
To: IllinoisCogComp/saul [email protected]
Subject: Re: [IllinoisCogComp/saul] WIP: MULAN for ranking+multi-class classification (#422)

BTW, it would be great to have a CCM formalization of ranking and see how we can do it in Saul, in a way that is consistent with our general formalization of structured output prediction using a specific loss, some constraints and classifiers.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_IllinoisCogComp_saul_pull_422-23issuecomment-2D252400639&d=DQMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=EoEIPOcXriNKNTRQxPa5uv7hPypxUE6tE_RlGOluh-c&m=j8pT0cfvCnTL5R8JE5mfuIpuEOyDANbpprvz9_b98c8&s=HBWDwRxguSS3pMUs6csWf-Swq8MFVBxYy804YNqr5yM&e=, or mute the threadhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_notifications_unsubscribe-2Dauth_APLC6itvj2gIxPloBm-2Dxck4RlQGIsvwrks5qxxLjgaJpZM4KRjhU&d=DQMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=EoEIPOcXriNKNTRQxPa5uv7hPypxUE6tE_RlGOluh-c&m=j8pT0cfvCnTL5R8JE5mfuIpuEOyDANbpprvz9_b98c8&s=HQhvtwy8bAiozHgv09bD4tUDxmBG1TIPBBpyfEh39vA&e=.

@kordjamshidi
Copy link
Member

Yes, I agree with @danr-ccg and I think that is the way to go for having ranking models in Saul. I will look at Kai-Wei's implementation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants